Product Image

Growing demand for wireless connectivity relies more and more on integrated antenna solutions customized for optimal system performance, cost and size. Achieving multiple performance metrics such as impedance matching, gain, radiation efficiency and operating bandwidth is a time consuming process involving numerous iterative simulations and a significant amount of design knowledge. With the demand for design experience greatly exceeding the current supply of antenna engineers, an alternative approach is needed.

Fortunately, research into the use of the evolutionary algorithms (EA), a programmatic method to explore the design space and automatically locate superior antenna designs, offers a means to accelerate the overall design process. EA is proving to be highly effective at generating antenna structures with greater performance than would otherwise be developed by traditional methods. AntSyn™, a combination of EA with RF/microwave simulation, has been successful in the development of a variety of antenna types for aerospace applications, and it is now available as a commercial product from National Instruments (NI).

AntSyn is an automated antenna design, synthesis and optimization tool that enables users to input antenna engineering requirements and output antenna designs. AntSyn was designed to be used both by experts and those who are relatively new to antenna design.

Figure 1

Figure 1 Antenna design complexity illustrated by the range of gain from varying the dipole length and reflector separation of a simple antenna.


A properly designed antenna is typically characterized by a number of critical performance metrics that are driven by the target application. Chief concerns relate to the directional characteristics (as depicted in the antenna’s radiation pattern) and the resulting gain. As a result, the range of antenna design types is extensive, with a very large number of shapes, sizes, requirements and applications. Designing and optimizing antennas by hand requires significant domain expertise. This time and labor intensive process depends on the aptitude or expertise of the designer to identify a suitable initial design that can be optimized to achieve the desired results (see Figure 1).

It is not uncommon for an experienced engineer to consume several months developing a new antenna design, depending on the level of difficulty defined by the antenna specifications. The time and effort invested increases significantly when addressing factors such as antenna interaction with the platform or wireless device and co-site interference. Design delays are compounded when program requirements change, such as in early stage development or where antenna integration requires in-situ optimization. The ability to conduct rapid antenna design and redesign is a growing concern as the number of wireless devices proliferates.

As an alternative or adjunct to designing by hand, since the early 1990s, researchers have been investigating methods based on evolutionary antenna design and optimization. One highly successful technique from NI is based on EA. This technology has been developed into a complete antenna synthesis tool, AntSyn, and has been used successfully by companies and government agencies operating in aerospace, communications and wireless electronics markets to design antennas operating at frequencies from below HF (2 MHz) to above Ka-Band (40 GHz). In contrast to the man-months of engineering time typically required for a final antenna design, AntSyn can generate a design in hours, optimizing trade-offs between criteria and often producing counter-intuitive designs that outperform traditional antennas.


AntSyn operates on a “what you want is what you get” principle, where the user inputs the antenna requirements, rather than a (parameterized) physical design. Antenna specifications such as frequency band, target impedance match (return loss), and gain pattern are input into the intuitive “spec sheet” user interface, which is automatically organized into a project file (see Figure 2a). By running the spec sheet, AntSyn returns one or more optimized antenna designs, the results of which are viewed using a customizable dashboard for rapid evaluation (see Figure 2b).

Figure 2

Figure 2 The AntSyn user interface spec sheet (a) defines the antenna requirements and the AntSyn results dashboard (b) enables rapid evaluation.

The user-specified dashboard can be set to view the proposed 3D model, input impedance (match) versus frequency in several formats, maximum gain versus frequency, radiation pattern cuts and qualitative star rating, all of which help identify good performers quickly. AntSyn has been used to develop a wide range of antenna types: single band, dual band, multiband, broadband and ultra-wideband (>100:1), high efficiency, loaded, electrically small, phased array, wire, patch, conformal, handset, multifunction and multiport.


Several types of antennas that generate modest gains with good linear or circular polarization over significant bandwidths include:

  • Microstrip patch, which is made up of one or more “patches” of metal, separated from a ground plane by a dielectric substrate
  • Helix antenna, a helical wire wound with a circumference of about one wavelength (1λ) and a pitch of λ/4 over a ground plane with a 1λminimum diameter
  • Single or crossed dipoles, which are center-fed radiating elements, each about λ/2 long with rods that are parallel to and over a ground plane of about λ/4 minimum diameter
  • Quadrifilar antenna, similar to short helix, and slot, which uses a small cutout in a ground plane and can conform to the skin of a satellite
  • Spiral antenna, which is wideband and may be cavity backed, two or three dimensional
  • Horn antenna, either used as the “feed” for reflector antennas or stand-alone.

Navigating which of these antenna configurations achieves the best overall performance for the reduced size, weight and cost demands is a challenging task, especially as non-traditional companies jump into wireless-enabled devices called for by the Internet of Things (IoT) and small satellite (NanoSat or CubeSat) markets. NI is addressing this challenge with smarter design and test solutions spanning early concept through final verification.

Figure 3

Figure 3 The AntSyn design is easily exported for final verification, whether to AXIEM or Analyst, within NI AWR Design Environment, or other 3D EM simulators.

Designers can expect to benefit from easily comparing the trade-offs between these different antenna types and then exploring more of the design space through smarter, knowledge-guided optimization. After achieving satisfactory design results, AntSyn antenna data can be transferred for verification in NI AWR Design Environment™, specifically AXIEM planar EM simulator, Analyst™ 3D finite element method (FEM) simulator or other third-party EM tools from Sonnet, ANSYS HFSS and CST Microwave Studio (seeFigure 3). This ability further extends design capabilities and the assurance of optimum results.

AntSyn provides an automated antenna design, synthesis and optimization tool that is well suited for helping designers of antennas, RF components and system engineers of many skill levels to address the challenges of next-generation antenna design and integration.

National Instruments
AWR Group, NI
El Segundo, Calif.