**Military Microwaves Supplement**

Space Fence Radar

Characterization of Single-Shot Large-Signal Phenomena

Device and PA Circuit Level Validations

This ad will close in seconds. Skip now

Advertisement

Advertisement

Recent Searchessetting strategies planar / wireless infrastructure / cst studio suite / ericsson / 1kw

Advertisement

Advertisement

March 1, 2002

One Comment

*Technical Feature*

*Two-tone vs. Single-tone Measurement of Second-order Nonlinearity *

*Darioush Agahi, William Domino and Nooshin Vakilian Conexant Systems Inc. Newport Beach, CA *

This article describes how to correctly find the second-order intercept point (IP2) from one- and two-tone tests, and presents measurement results in support of the theory.

**Relation Between Two-tone and One-tone Tests For Second-order Nonlinearity **

Second-order nonlinearity is a phenomenon that is important in direct conversion receivers (DCR). Test results for this kind of nonlinearity are shown, which can be used to predict the direct current (DC) offset, both with single-tone or two-tone signals. A two-tone condition is shown pictorially in **Figure 1** .

**Fig. 1 Two-tone condition; (a) input and (b) output.**

The relationships between f_{1} , f_{2} and f_{3} , f_{4} are

**f _{3} = f_{2} - f_{1} **

and

**f _{4} = f_{2} + f_{1} **

This shows that the unwanted output frequency components are mathematically related to the input tones. To have better insight into the relationship between undesired components and the input terms, a more rigorous derivation is needed. Here is an attempt in showing the derivation with some simplifications.

Using a Taylor series expansion, the output voltage V_{o} of the gain stage as a function of input voltage v_{i} can be modeled as

**V _{o} (t) = k_{1} v_{i} (t) + k_{2} v_{i} ^{2} (t) + k_{3} v_{i} ^{3} (t) + k_{4} v_{i} ^{4} (t) +k_{5} v_{i} ^{5} (t) + … (1) **

For a two-tone input

**V _{i} (t) = A cos(**

Inserting Equation 2 into Equation 1 and using well-known trigonometric equalities

In this study the sum term is ignored since the baseband filters of the device will reject it. However, the difference term is retained, since it can be used to evaluate the DC offset of the receiver. Note that in practice the input tones are chosen such that the difference can produce a tone near DC, that is, inside the receiver's baseband bandwidth. From Equation 3, the pure DC terms are

and the difference term is

Under a single tone condition, B is set to zero and the DC created is

For a two-tone test and only second-order nonlinearity, the higher order terms are ignored and the coefficient of the output is then k_{2} AB. This coefficient is the peak amplitude voltage of the difference frequency output. When calculating the second-order intermodulation product (IM2) it is the measured power that is required, so the RMS output voltage

is needed.

The ratio of the output of the one-tone test to the output of the two-tone test is then given by

The numerator is the DC output voltage from the one-tone test, and the denominator is the AC_{RMS} voltage from the two-tone test. Remember that in the one-tone test, the input amplitude is A, while in the two-tone test the amplitudes are A and B. Assuming equal tones for the two-tone test (B = A), then

This simply says that the root mean square (RMS) alternate current (AC) signal created from a two-tone test is 3 dB higher than the DC offset created from a single-tone test, when the single-tone test uses the same amplitude as one of the two-tones. In other words, DC voltage (one-tone) = AC RMS voltage (two-tones) - 3 dB.

**Fig. 2 DC and AC (rms) outputs vs. blocker input level.**

This is verified by measurement in the graph shown in **Figure 2** , where the receiver under test exhibits a significant amount of second-order nonlinearity. In this test, the single-tone was at 3 MHz offset, while the two-tones were at 3.00 and 3.06 MHz, so a DC IM2 output in dBVDC is being compared to a 60 kHz IM2 output in dBVRMS. The 60 kHz output is expected to be 3 dB higher as derived above. But in the measurement system, there is a low pass response that rolls off by 1.4 dB at 60 kHz. Therefore, the 60 kHz output should be 1.6 dB higher than the DC. This is indeed the case over most of the tested range.

**Second-order Intercept (IP2) Calculation From Two-tone and One-tone Measurements **

In **Figure 3** , the fundamental and second-order output powers vs. input power are plotted for a generic system that has some second-order nonlinearity. The gain is normalized to unity so IIP2 = OIP2. In practice, all quantities are usually referred to the input.

**Fig. 3 Fundamental and second-order output powers vs. input power.**

By convention, in any two-tone test (including third-order IP3 tests), the power levels plotted refer to one of the input tones and one of the output product tones. Therefore, even though the system has an amount of power applied to it that is 3 dB higher than the power of one-tone alone, only the power of one-tone is plotted, not the sum of both. Likewise, only the IM2 power at the difference frequency f_{2} - f_{1} , rather than the sum of powers at both f_{2} - f_{1} and f_{2} + f_{1} , is plotted.

From the slopes of the curves, we can see that IP2 can be calculated from one set of measurements as

**IP2 = 2(P _{in} ) - IM2**

where all quantities are in dBm.

This classical IP2 equation has a resemblance to the much more often used IP3 equation for a two-tone test, which is

**2(IP3) = 3(P _{in} ) - IM3**

The next question is how to correctly calculate IP2 when a one-tone test is done and the IM2 product is at DC. The answer must be the same as that found in the two-tone test.

First, the conventions for the one-tone test must be chosen. IP2 is calculated based on the power of the single applied tone (even though this is all the power applied to the system, unlike what is done in the two-tone calculation), and on the DC output power (where the other, higher frequency product, which is at 2f_{1} , is ignored).

In the two-tone test, as shown previously, inputs of Acos(w_{1} t) and Acos(w_{2} t) result in an IM2 product of k_{2} A^{2} cos((w_{2} - w_{1} )t). The peak voltage of one input is A, while the RMS value is A/√2. Likewise, the peak voltage of the IM2 output is k_{2} A^{2} , while its RMS value is k_{2} A^{2} /√2. The IP2 calculation from the two-tone test is then IP2_{2-tone} = 2(P_{in} ) - IM2

In the one-tone test, the single input is Acos(w_{1} t), resulting in a DC IM2 output voltage of k_{2} A^{2} /2. The peak input voltage is A, while its RMS value is A/√2. If the classical IP2 calculation is recklessly applied with these quantities, one would obtain

**IP2 _{1-tone} = 2(P_{in} ) - IM2 **

The second term in Equation 6 is 3 dB lower than the second term in Equation 5. This is the same 3 dB difference already identified in the first part of this article. Therefore, the results from a one-tone test are used to calculate IP2 using IP2 = 2(P_{in} ) - IM2, and 3 dB must first be added to the measurement of the DC IM2 product. Then the result will match that of the two-tone test. Therefore, the correct IP2 equation for a one-tone test, where P_{in} is the power of the single input tone and IM2 is the power of the DC output, is

**IP2 = 2(P _{in} ) - (IM2_{DC} + 3 dB) (7)**

Using the IM2 data presented in the earlier graph, the IP2 is calculated according to IP2 = 2(P_{in} ) - IM2_{ACRMS} for the two-tone test, and IP2 = 2(P_{in} ) - (IM2_{DC} + 3 dB) for the one-tone test. The results are plotted in **Figure 4** . The calculated IP2 values are found to generally agree.

**Fig. 4 IP2 values for single-tone and two-tone tests as calculated from IM2 data.**

**IP2 Requirements for a GSM Direct Conversion Receiver **

For a direct conversion receiver, second-order nonlinearity causes any large blocking signal to result in an unwanted DC output. This effect can be characterized using IP2 as the measure of merit. It is desirable that the receiver exhibit maximum IP2.

For consistency, the same equation that is used to calculate IP2 performance from IM2 data must also be used to determine the IP2 requirement from the maximum IM2 that the system can tolerate. The GSM AM suppression specification (from GSM specification 05.05) sets the IP2 requirement for a direct conversion receiver. For the GSM900 band, the single blocker applied is -31 dBm, while the desired signal is at -99 dBm. In order to keep the DC product below -9 dBc, the IIP2 must be

**IIP2 _{REQ} = 2(P_{in} ) - (IM2_{DC} + 3 dB) **

where the IM2 level is referred to the antenna. The value is calculated as

**IIP2 _{REQ} = 2(-31 dBm) - ((-99 dBm - 9 dBm) + 3 dB) **

**IIP2 _{900MHz REQ} = +43 dBm at the antenna. **

Then, in a receiver with 3 dB of front-end loss due to switches and filters, the IIP2 requirement at the LNA input becomes

**IIP2 _{900MHz REQ} = +40 dBm **

at the LNA input. Likewise, for DCS1800 and PCS1900 receivers with 3 dB front-end loss, the IIP2 requirements at the LNA inputs are calculated to be +42 dBm and +44 dBm, respectively.

**Conclusion **

Care must be taken when relating the results of two-tone and one-tone tests for IP2. With all tones applied being equal in amplitude, the two-tone test produces an AC RMS voltage that is 3 dB higher than the DC voltage produced by the one-tone test. This must be taken into account consistently when using a one-tone test to determine both IP2 requirements and measured performance of a receiver.

**References**

1. W.E. Sabin and E.O. Schoenike, *Single Sideband Systems and Circuits* , Second Edition, McGraw Hill, 1995.

2. B. Razavi, *RF Microelectronics* , Prentice Hall, 1998.

*Darioush Agahi is director of GSM RF Systems Engineering at Conexant Systems Inc. in Newport Beach, CA. Prior to joining Conexant in 1996 he worked for 10 years for Motorola's (GSM) cellular subscriber division. Darioush received his BS degree in electronics in 1981 and his MS degree in medical engineering from George Washington University in 1983. He also received his MSEE degree from the Illinois Institute of Technology in 1993 and his MBA from National University in 1997. Darioush holds twelve US patents. He is a professional engineer (PE) registered in the state of Wisconsin. He may be reached via e-mail at darioush.agahi@conexant.com. *

*William Domino is a principal engineer for GSM RF Systems Engineering at Conexant Systems Inc. in Newport Beach, CA, where he has been employed since 1992 in the area of digital-radio system architecture development. He received his BSEE degree from the University of Southern California in 1979 and his master's in engineering from California State Polytechnic University in 1985. His interests currently include receiver and transmitter system design for various cellular standards, as well as filter design. In these areas he has one patent issued and 10 patents pending. He may be reached via e-mail at william.domino@conexant.com *

*Nooshin Vakilian is a systems engineer for GSM RF Systems Engineering at Conexant Systems Inc. in Newport Beach, CA, where she has been employed since 1996 in the area of digital-radio system architecture development. She received her BSEE degree from California State Polytechnic University in 1993 and her master's in engineering from the University of Southern California in 1996. Her interests currently include receiver system design for various cellular standards. She may be reached via e-mail at nooshin.vakilian@conexant.com. *

Get access to premium content and e-newsletters by registering on the web site. You can also subscribe to Microwave Journal magazine.

Advertisement