Microwave Journal

Modern Flat Panel Antenna Technology for Ku-/Ka-Band User Terminals in LEO Satellite Communications Systems

September 14, 2021

In recent years, an increasing number of broadband satellite systems have been launched into low earth orbit (LEO), connecting people across the globe. Flat panel antennas are especially attractive for LEO satellites due to their tracking ability, low profile and easy installation. This article discusses three major antenna technologies: electronically scanned array (ESA), variable inclination continuous transverse stub (VICTS) and lens antenna. ESAs consist of arrays of individually controlled radiating antenna elements with different phase delays that coherently form and scan the antenna beam in the far field. Within the category of ESA antennas are analog, digital and hybrid antennas with passive or active radios. VICTS antennas consist of rotating disks that steer the beam and change polarization based on the relative position of the disks. Lens antennas consist of modular lens sets that steer the beam by individually controlling the source of energy relative to the focus of each lens. Each of these technologies has strengths and weaknesses that are compared in this article using the size, weight, power consumption and cost (SWaP-C) metric.

Since 2015, numerous satellite communications companies have designed and launched high throughput broadband systems to connect rural and underserved markets. These satellite systems have become more technologically feasible than those two decades ago, due to advances in wireless technologies as well as decreases in launch service and manufacturing costs. Non-cost prohibitive user terminals (UTs) and service plans, however, are required for a profitable broadband business, particularly in rural areas.

Ku- and Ka-Band satellite UTs require highly directive antennas to close RF links with satellites orbiting at altitudes of a few hundred to a few thousand kilometers above the earth’s surface. Fixed parabolic reflectors are commonly used for conventional geostationary (GEO) satellite systems, which do not necessitate tracking, as the satellite’s position relative to the user terminal is fixed over time. LEO constellations, however, require tracking and satellite-to-satellite handovers to maintain connectivity. These features, along with cumbersome mechanics and form factors, make parabolic antennas less attractive for LEO systems.

Flat panel antennas with low profiles and user-friendly installation processes have therefore become critical components in successful satellite broadband systems. This article discusses current Ku-/Ka-Band UT antenna technologies, describing ESA, VICTS and lens antenna architectures. It discusses advantages and disadvantages in terms of SWaP-C.


Figure 1

Figure 1 Antenna array gain and beamwidth depend on the number of radiating elements.

For LEO systems, an attractive alternative to the conventional dish antenna is an ESA, also known as a phased array antenna. An ESA includes an array of several individual sub-wavelength radiating antenna elements whose relative phases are controlled such that the overall beam from the array radiates in a particular direction due to constructive and destructive interference between individual elements.1 The process of constructing a concentrated beam using phased array antennas is called beamforming.2 The strength of the overall beam depends directly on the number of coherent radiating elements and the array configuration in the antenna; a higher number of radiating elements contributes to a narrower and more powerful main lobe with smaller and less powerful side lobes (see Figure 1).

Beamforming antenna systems can actively position their main beams and their nulls at specific angular locations using either analog phase shifters or digital coding algorithms. These beam steering techniques increase the throughput of the phased array without increasing transmit power.3

Three popular beamforming techniques are analog, digital and hybrid. While all three have have similar high-level architectures, there are two types of hardware implementations. Any of these beamforming techniques can be implemented using active radio components (e.g. RF amplifiers) external to the array or using integrated electronics (where the radios are embedded directly into the antenna array). A beamforming architecture with RF amplifiers built into the antenna array is called an active beamforming array. Beamforming architectures with external amplifiers or radios are called passive beamforming arrays.4

Active Beamforming

Analog beamforming is the most basic technique. It uses a single RF chain that connects each antenna element with amplifiers and phase shifters followed by splitters or combiners (see Figure 2a). The phase shifters, splitters and combiners are implemented using analog hardware. Beam shape and direction are controlled by digitally adjusting the phase shifters along the RF paths. Analog beamforming is usually more cost-effective and less complex than digital beamforming; however, it can effectively support only a single beam, being restricted to the same signal for each antenna element. Multi-beam transmission is possible, but it is tedious and complex.5 The antenna array is a full duplex (simultaneous transmission and reception), single aperture that uses frequency multiplexing with independently controlled transmit and receive channels for each radiating element.1

Figure 2

Figure 2 Receiver architectures for analog beamforming (a), digital beamforming (b) and hybrid beamforming (c).

Although digital beamforming is like analog beamforming, it differs in that each antenna element has a dedicated RF-to-digital signal and path, rather than a single common RF chain (see Figure 2b). Each individual path converts the RF signal to baseband (and vice versa) through RF mixers, ADCs and DACs. In this way, each path allows independent beam control, as phases and amplitudes can be controlled digitally through baseband processing. This increase in control allows multi-stream signal processing at the element level and enables the possibility to serve multiple users simultaneously through multiple physical beams.

One of the major challenges of the digital beamforming architecture is the distribution of local oscillator (LO) signals used for the mixers of each channel. The coherence of the LO affects the beam patterns and the system phase noise. In addition, digital beamforming structures consume high amounts of power due to demanding processor performance requirements.5

Hybrid Beamforming combines aspects of analog and digital beamforming. It uses digitally controlled RF chains that are further complemented by analog splitters and analog phase shifters (see Figure 2c). Fewer RF chains are therefore needed, which decreases total power consumption. The number of antennas used in hybrid beamforming are significantly higher than the number of A/D converters, which results in a smaller number of supported data streams. That said, hybrid beamforming is a reasonably priced alternative to digital beamforming because it consumes less power while still allowing multi-stream transmission.5

Figure 2c is a block diagram of the receive side of an active hybrid ESA. It comprises an array of antenna elements partitioned into multiple analog beamforming sub-arrays, a digital beamformer on the sub-array outputs and a control path back to the analog phase shifters. This reduces the size of the digital beamformer by a factor equal to the average number of elements in each sub-array. It provides an efficient means of producing large, high gain adaptive antenna arrays at relatively low cost.6

Passive Beamforming

Liquid-crystal (LC)-based passive beamformers have been designed for Ku/Ka-Band UTs. This type of array operates using the principle of phase delay in RF planar transmission lines on a LC substrate. By applying and controlling a DC voltage bias across the LC layer, one can adjust the alignment of the LC molecules in the substrate and change the associated dielectric constant to introduce phase delay to a signal on the transmission line.

Without active electronic amplifiers, the passive beamforming array has significantly lower DC power consumption than an active array, and a more straightforward antenna architecture as well. However, the passive antenna panel size is usually larger due to intrinsic losses of the LC and other PCB materials. The LC molecules’ time response (on the order of milliseconds) can result in slow array beam switching and cause temporary UT-satellite radio link interruption during handover in a LEO satellite system. The molecular response time also depends on operating temperature, so an additional heater may be required to maintain performance for operation in an extreme environment.


Figure 3

Figure 3 Top view of upper disk rotated relative to lower disk in a VICTS antenna.8

A VICTS antenna is a type of passive flat panel aperture antenna consisting of multiple stacked disks that mechanically rotate around a single axis to achieve azimuth and elevation beam scanning.7 The most basic VICTS antenna uses two disks, an upper disk and a lower disk. The upper disk has long parallel slits cut through it that enable electromagnetic waves to propagate. These slits are the radiating elements of the aperture and are known as continuous transverse stubs. The lower disk contains one, or more, line sources that produce electromagnetic waves. The space between the upper and the lower disk acts like a planar waveguide structure carrying the electromagnetic waves that feed the radiation.

Figure 3 demonstrates the upper plate being rotated relative to the lower plate by some angle, Ψ. As seen in the figure, the wavefront of the guided waves between the two disks becomes inclined to the transverse stubs. This inclination between disks creates a phase delay between the radiated waves in each of the stubs and steers the beam in elevation.8 When both disks are rotated together, the antenna changes its scan angle in azimuth.

Disk rotation can be achieved in several ways including belt driven, perimeter gear driven, direct gear driven or through magnetic induction.8 More advanced VICTS antennas may have additional disks that serve to transmit or receive different polarizations other than the standard linear polarization of the basic VICTS architecture.7

One example uses a meanderline polarizer along with a grid line polarizer to change the polarization from linear to circular for transmit and from circular to linear for receive. A meanderline polarizer typically consists of at least one thin dielectric substrate layer on which conducting periodic meandering patterns are printed. The gridline polarizer is made using a similar structure and materials but consists of periodic parallel conducting traces. These two polarizers in the form of disks can be stacked on top of the VICTS apparatus with the meanderline polarizer above the gridline polarizer. The gridline polarizer pre-adjusts the angle of the linear polarization emitted from the VICTS antenna, ensuring an optimum axial ratio over frequency and scan, while the meanderline polarizer changes the polarization from linear to circular and vice versa. These two disks rotate as needed to achieve linear, right-hand or left-hand circular polarization while achieving an optimum axial ratio and impedance matching versus scan angle.9

Compared with the other flat panel antennas, VICTS antennas have a lower profile, a more simplistic design, higher radiation efficiency and fewer blind zones.7,10 Although VICTS antennas are mechanically driven, they have fewer moving parts than other mechanically-driven antennas and thus have reliabilities comparable to ESAs. This is especially true for VICTS antennas that use magnetic induction for rotation.8

In addition, VICTS antennas have minimal blind zones in which element coupling is significantly reduced in some scan regions.8 The blind zone in the VICTS antenna occurs when the beam is operating one to two degrees around the zenith, due to the wave propagating along the surface of the antenna instead of radiating outwards. Its large scanning range is an advantage over many 2D scanning phased arrays whose densely packed elements cause energy to be absorbed by adjacent elements when scanning at low scan angles.11 Furthermore, VICTS antennas use less energy and emit less heat than ESAs because they have less electronic components.8


A lens antenna is a type of phased array comprising modular lens sets that integrate radiating elements or feeds with lenses made of low loss dielectric materials shaped with specific curvatures. The gradient index (GRIN) lens is preferred in most applications due to its flat surfaces, wide scanning range and short focal length.12 Some applications use multi-layer composite dielectric lenses for ease of manufacturing with acceptable impedance matching and optical properties.

The optical properties of each lens set enhances directivity by focusing a plane wave to a small radiating element or feed at the RF front-end.13 This effectively downsizes the array number, reduce the overall cost of electronic components and DC power consumption. Most lens designs also enable optical off-axis focusing, which provides additional beam scanning flexibility for array operation. The overall antenna system, however, still uses an active analog or digital beamforming architecture for RF signal conditioning.

Figure 4

Figure 4 Cutaway view of a lens antenna.12

Depending on its architecture, a lens antenna can operate with two levels of beam scanning (coarse and fine beam pointing) to jointly steer the beam. Coarse beam pointing is executed by the lens set and front-end circuitry to create a directive broad beam that is steered by shifting the location of a feed element in relation to the focal point of the lens. This shift is either performed by electromechanical actuators or by electronically enabling or disabling feed elements within a small front-end feed array. Fine beam pointing is then done by combining corresponding feed elements in each lens of the array with phase shifts or time delays in the analog or digital beamforming networks.

The lens antenna architecture supports multi-beam operation in a single aperture. Multiple beams can be created by locating multiple feeds at different focal points of a lens. Each feed is connected to an individual RF circuit and associated network for independent beamforming. A large element spacing due to the physical size of each lens can create unwanted grating lobes. These grating lobes can be minimized by steering element patterns or by offsetting the phase center of each lens to break up the array periodicity.12

Figure 4 shows one concept of a lens antenna. Each lens set includes the lens (112), the lens spacer (114) and the feed set (150) with its respective feed element(s) (152).12 With this setup, each lens set is enabled as needed for multiple beams, high bandwidth and low power.14

The unique characteristics of the lens antenna provides advantages over a conventional phased array.16-17 With lens-assisted aperture directivity, it uses significantly less elements, reducing the active circuitry per beam for less power consumption and heat generation. In addition, some lens designs provide optical properties that enable elevation scanning with better directivity roll-off compared to the typical flat panel ESA.


In Table 1, ESA, VICTS and lens antenna technologies are compared in terms of SWaP-C for LEO broadband communications constellations. Design challenges are identified for each.

Table 1

A flat panel antenna’s ability to track and perform satellite-to-satellite handovers makes it a critical element of a broadband satellite system. Current Ku-/Ka-Band UT flat panel antennas are described and compared. The ESA’s multiple arrays of individual radiating antenna elements enables it to steer main and null beams toward specific locations with differences in strength and beamwidth depending on the number of radiating elements.

Three ESA beamforming techniques are analog, digital and hybrid. Analog beamforming is the simplest to implement, using one signal to steer the beam by shifting its phase for each antenna element. Due to its single RF chain, however, it can usually only steer one beam. Digital beamforming uses a dedicated signal for each antenna element, enabling independent control of multiple beams through baseband processing at the expense of prime power and cost. Similarly, hybrid beamforming accomplishes beam steering with a reduced number of RF chains combined with analog phase shifters. The combination of digital and analog beamforming techniques is limited to a smaller number of data streams but is less expensive than digital beamforming.

The VICTS antenna employs a simple structure of rotating mechanical disks allowing minimal blind zones while still radiating high energy.

The lens antenna’s modular lens allows for a lightweight terminal with different options in terms of gain, scanning range and relative transmit and receive performance.


  1. R. W. Nichols, J. S. Mason, G. M. Shows, J. C. Roper, R. D. Eppich, G. A. Burnum and I. Chang, “Active Electronically Scanned Array Antenna for Satellite Communications,” U.S. Patent 8, 334, 809, December 2012.
  2. J. Fruhlinger, “Beamforming Explained: How it Makes Wireless Communication Faster,” NETWORKWORLD, October 2019. Web. https://www.networkworld.com/article/3445039/beamforming-explained-how-it-makes-wireless-communication-faster.html.
  3. “What is 5G Beamforming, Beam steering and Beam Switching with Massive MIMO,” metaswitch, Web. https://www.metaswitch.com/knowledge-center/reference/what-is-beamforming-beam-steering-and-beam-switching-with-massive-mimo.
  4. A. Milne, “Understanding the Difference, and Debunking the Myths, Between Active and Passive Antennas,” RF Venue, December 2014. Web. https://www.rfvenue.com/blog/2014/12/15/active-v-passive-anntennas.
  5. M. N. Hamdy, “Beamformers Explained,” Commscope, 2020. Web. https://www.commscope.com/globalassets/digizuite/542044-Beamformer-Explained-WP-114491-EN.pdf.
  6. Y. J. Guo, J. D. Bunton, V. Dyadyuk and X. Huang, “Hybrid Adaptive Antenna Array,” U.S. Patent 8, 754, 810, June 2014.
  7. B. R. Elbert, “Aeronautical Broadband for Commercial Aviation: Evaluating the 2Ku Solution,” Application Technology Strategy, L.L.C., November 2014. Web. https://www.thinkom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Gogo_2Ku_Whitepaper_Rev2.pdf.
  8. W. W. Milroy, S. B. Coppedge and A. C. Lemons, “Variable Inclination Continuous Transverse Stub Array,” U.S. Patent 6, 919, 854, July 2005.
  9. W. Milroy and A. C. Lemons, “Linear to CP Polarizer with Enhanced Performance in Victs Antennas,” U.S. Patent 0, 313, 303, October 2020.
  10. M. Wei, J. Liu, H. Li and S. Liu, “Design of a Variable Inclination Continuous Transverse Stub Array,” International Symposium on Antennas, Propagation and EM Theory, December 2018.
  11. H. H. Vo and C. Chen, “Frequency and Scan Angle Limitations in UWB Phased Array,” European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, April 2014.
  12. C. P. Scarborough, J. P. Turpin and D. F. DiFonzo, “Lens Antenna System,” U.S. Patent 0, 269, 576, September 2018.
  13. J. P. Turmpin, C. P. Scarborough, D. F. Difonzo and J. Finney, “System and Method for Providing a Compact, Flat, Microwave Lens with Wide Angular Field of Regard and Wideband Operation,” U.S. Patent 0, 183, 152, June 28, 2018.
  14. “Solution: A New Class of Satellite Terminal,” Isotropic Systems, Web. https://www.isotropicsystems.com/solution.
  15. “Satellite Broadband Ka-Band Terminals,” ThinWave, Web. https://www.thinkom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ka-band-user-terminals_thinkom-solutions.pdf.
  16. “Satellite Broadband Ku-Band Terminals,” ThinWave, Web. https://www.thinkom.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ku-band-user-terminals_thinkom-solutions.pdf.
  17. “The Isotropic Antenna: The Perfect Solution for Aero?” Satellite Mobility World, May 2020.