- Buyers Guide
Aerospace & Defense Electronics Supplement
Early Returns: U.S. Export Control Reform Positive
A&D Test & Measurement
Efficient Design and Analysis of Airborne Radomes
In order for a company to develop a profitable growth strategy, it should have a detailed understanding of its costs, competitive position and customer environment. However, due to resource constraints, department managers are usually focused on near term issues, and don’t have the time to focus on longer-term strategic issues. As such, any long-term analysis is substituted with conventional wisdom about the company and the markets they compete in. Unfortunately, more often than not, conventional wisdom is far off the mark from reality.
For example, the finance department spends most of their time managing accounts receivable and payables, and reporting on prior period profit and loss statements. It is rare to find the finance people focused on understanding true product costs that can, in turn, be used to price strategically.
The sales/marketing departments are typically focused on quoting new business (based on poor cost information) and closing open orders. Occasionally they spend time on promotional activities such as tradeshows, advertising and creation of collateral materials. Most marketing departments do not understand their customers’ product roadmap, the competitive threats of substitutive technologies, new market opportunities or the optimal sales channels through which to market their products.
As a result, to the extent that strategic plans are created, they are based on inaccurate or dated information, resulting in poor plans that rarely succeed.
However, in order for a company to maximize its investment in people, technology and capital, it must develop strategies that are synchronized with current and accurate information about its profitability, competitive and customer environment.
AVERAGES are DECEIVING - While the combination of ice water and boiling water results in tepid water, most people would agree that they would rather not have ice water poured on a hand followed by boiling water.
If a company is going to set out to grow its business, it is important that it grows its profitable product lines and develops turnaround or exit strategies for underperforming ones. To understand if a product line is profitable, you must understand the direct costs that are associated with the product line and eliminate as many “allocated” expenses as possible. Most companies use a flat manufacturing overhead rate and apply it to direct labor hours. Decades ago, when direct labor was the dominant cost and overhead was minor, this made sense. Today, with the high degree of automation and support functions such as quality and information technology, overhead can be three to four times the cost of direct labor. Therefore, direct labor is more than likely to be the wrong variable to allocate overhead.
In addition, not every product line uses the same assets equally, and therefore have the same overhead rate. For example, one product line may use an inexpensive semi-automated machine, whereas another uses an expensive fully automated machine. To allocate the depreciation, supplies and other costs of both machines in the same overhead pool would over-allocate the semi-automated product line with depreciation while under-allocating the fully automated product line.
To the extent possible, companies must identify the costs that are unique or dedicated to a product line and apply these costs directly to the product line. This includes not only traditional manufacturing overhead charges such as depreciation and supplies, but also engineering and sales, if these costs are dedicated to a product line. Other shared expenses should be allocated based on appropriate metrics. For example, facilities charges such as rent and utilities might be allocated based on facility space used, while the cost of incoming quality inspection might be allocated based on the value of materials purchased.
When going through this exercise, management is often surprised to find that product line profitability is far different from what they had originally thought.
When armed with this knowledge, management can begin to make educated decisions with respect to pricing strategies, new product development plans and product line dispositions in order to optimize the business’ profitability and growth.
Most of the conversations that companies have with their customers involve the customer’s purchasing department. These discussions are usually about pricing, quantity and timing of new or existing orders. Unfortunately, information related to the future direction of the customer rarely resides in the purchasing department.
In order to find out where the customer is heading, it is important to talk with their marketing and engineering personnel. Marketing people can provide a sense of the size of their market, their growth rate, their competitive situation and anticipated changes in their product offerings. This information is useful for developing the size and growth rate of your product to this market as well as for identifying other potential customers, that is, your customers’ competitors.
Engineers are an excellent resource to understand any changes in the technical implementation of their new products, which may either provide new applications for your technology or make it obsolete. They are also an excellent resource to help define new products concepts.
Your competitors can be an excellent source of information about your industry. While competitors are not willing participants, by analyzing their public actions, you can learn valuable insights. See what tradeshows they attend. If they attend tradeshows for markets that you don’t compete in, attend the tradeshow, see what products they are exhibiting and what potential customers are present. Look at your competitors’ sales channels. Do they sell through a channel (such as a distribution channel) different from yours? Do they use independent sales representatives that might want to represent you instead? Do they mention customers on their Web site? Are you aware of these customers and the markets in which they compete?
In summary, companies that are resource constrained tend to rely on the myths of conventional wisdom to guide their future. They rarely have the luxury of a professional staff to take a fresh look at their business, identifying market trends, new channels, competitive threats and other factors challenging their business. However, armed with current and accurate information about their operating environment, a company can successfully develop profitable growth strategies.
For more information, visit www.synxronos.com.
About the Author:
Kenneth F. Stern is President and founder of Synxronos.
Ken's career spans over 30 years focused on strategic planning and corporate development for technology-oriented manufacturing companies. Prior to forming Synxronos, Ken served as VP Strategic Planning & Corporate Development, leading strategy and M&A for Axsys Technologies, a manufacturer of precision optical and opto-mechanical products, which was sold to General Dynamics. Prior to Axsys, Ken served as Case Team Leader for Monitor Company and led the electronics practice at Lorne Weil Inc., a boutique strategy consulting firm focused on strategy and corporate development for technology businesses.
Ken holds a BS in Electrical Engineering from Lafayette College and an MBA in Marketing and Finance from Columbia University.
Ken has helped management teams in a broad variety of industries to develop growth strategies involving technology, market segmentation, sales channels, competitive positioning, acquisitions and divestitures.
Get access to premium content and e-newsletters by registering on the web site. You can also subscribe to Microwave Journal magazine.